Adjudicate competing intuitions to a defensible settled position
Packaged know-how that tells an agent how to do a job well.
You might say…
“I keep arguing both sides in my head and I don't know which one I actually believe.”
What it does
Holds two incompatible intuitions side by side, works out why each seems true, identifies what would resolve the conflict, and proposes which view survives or how both are partly right.
Trigger: Use in a deliberate reasoning session whose explicit purpose is resolving internal intellectual tension — when stalling between two positions is costing progress.
I/O: Two or more competing intuitions → resolution verdict with reasoning chain and proposed settled position
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation