Check the dimension set for gaps and overlap against the promise
Judges whether a candidate dimension set collectively covers the deliverable promise with no gaps and stays distinct with no overlapping pairs, flagging specific offenders with rationale.
In / outCandidate dimension set + deliverable promise → verdict per dimension pair (distinct/overlapping) + list of missing coverage areas
You might say…
“Two dimensions that overlap don't double your coverage — they halve your clarity, and the scoring suffers every time.”
What it does
Takes a candidate dimension set and the deliverable promise and judges whether the dimensions collectively cover the promise (no gap) and stay distinct (no overlap), flagging specific offending pairs or missing areas with rationale. Used once a draft dimension set exists, before locking it. Single judgement call per review.
Trigger: Use once a draft dimension set exists and before locking it, as the coverage-and-distinctness check.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation