Adjudicate borderline completion cases
Given a learner who narrowly misses or partially meets completion criteria, judges whether to grant completion, request remediation, or decline, with a reasoned rationale.
In / outFlagged learner record + completion criteria + circumstances → adjudication decision (grant / remediate / decline) with written rationale
You might say…
“He submitted everything but was absent for one live session due to a family emergency. The rule says no, but the situation says maybe. I need a defensible call.”
What it does
Given a learner who narrowly misses or partially meets completion criteria (one missing assignment, extenuating circumstances, late but substantial work), judge whether to grant completion, request remediation, or decline, with a rationale. Used when the mechanical verification flags an ambiguous case requiring educator discretion.
Trigger: Use when the mechanical verification flags an ambiguous case — partial completion, extenuating circumstances, late submission — that requires educator discretion rather than a rule.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation