Review a contributor deliverable against the brief
Takes a returned contributor deliverable and the original brief and assesses what was delivered well, where it diverged, what needs a revision round, and drafts an acceptance or revision-request note.
In / outReturned deliverable + original brief → assessment of fit/gaps + draft acceptance-or-revision-request note
You might say…
“I used to accept work that missed the brief because I felt awkward pushing back — now I have a structured read before I decide.”
What it does
Single-judgement skill: takes a returned deliverable and the original brief and assesses whether the work meets what was asked — what was delivered well, where it diverged from or missed the brief, what needs a revision round, and a draft acceptance-or-revision-request note. The author decides whether to accept, push back, or escalate. Used each time a contributor returns work for review.
Trigger: Use each time a contributor returns work for review.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation