Reconcile scores against supporting evidence
Walks each scorecard rating and judges whether it is justified by the evidence cited in support, flagging any score that the evidence does not bear out or that contradicts the rubric.
In / outAssembled scorecard with ratings + evidence references → list of reconciliation flags
You might say…
“Assembly can drift ratings away from the data — I need a pass that checks each score still matches what it's meant to be based on.”
What it does
Judgement call that walks each scorecard rating and checks it is justified by the evidence cited in support — flagging scores that the evidence does not bear out or that contradict the rubric. Used to catch ratings that drifted from the data during assembly.
Trigger: Use to catch ratings that moved during assembly, before the artefact leaves the firm.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation