Check facts and conclusions agree across sections
Reviews the executive summary, detailed findings, and conclusions to confirm they tell the same story — same numbers, no contradictory verdicts, consistent phrasing of key facts — and flags any internal contradictions.
In / outAssembled deliverable (all sections) → list of consistency flags and contradictions
You might say…
“The sections were written at different times and I need to know they agree before the client reads across them.”
What it does
Judgement review that confirms the executive summary, detailed findings, and conclusions tell the same story — same numbers, no contradictory verdicts, consistent phrasing of key facts. Used to catch internal contradictions before the artefact reaches the client.
Trigger: Use to catch cross-section contradictions before the artefact reaches the client.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation