Recommend the access-model change
Weighs the current delivery model against the alternatives — live cohort, rolling cohort, evergreen self-serve, hybrid — given delivery learning and capacity, and recommends the model to move to with trade-offs and operational implications.
In / outCurrent delivery model + delivery learning + capacity constraints → recommended access-model change with trade-offs and operational implications
You might say…
“I'm burned out running live cohorts but I don't know if evergreen would actually work for what I teach — I need to think it through properly.”
What it does
Weighs the current delivery model against the alternatives (live cohort, rolling cohort, evergreen self-serve, hybrid) given delivery learning and capacity, and recommends the model to move to with the trade-offs and operational implications. Used when the educator is deciding how the product should reach learners going forward.
Trigger: Use when deciding whether and how to change how the product reaches learners, grounded in delivery experience rather than abstract preference.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation