Adversarially test outcome-to-content coverage
Runs an adversarial coverage check — argues the case that the curriculum does NOT deliver on each stated outcome, forcing the educator to close genuine gaps before building.
In / outLearning outcomes + curriculum blueprint → coverage verdict per outcome with gap flags
You might say…
“My curriculum looked thorough until someone asked 'where exactly do they learn X?' — this runs that question systematically so I'm not ambushed post-launch.”
What it does
Single-judgement skill that runs the adversarial coverage check: argues the curriculum does NOT deliver its stated outcomes — naming outcomes with no module teaching them, modules teaching nothing tied to an outcome, and exercises that fail to evidence the success criteria they claim. Forces every outcome to trace to teaching and assessment, or be cut. Used alongside the learner-journey walk as the second validation lens before production.
Trigger: Use as a final design check before committing to content production, particularly for any promised outcomes not yet backed by clear content.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation