Recommend which patterns warrant a group-level address
Takes clustered submission patterns and recommends which gaps justify a live re-teach versus an async broadcast versus individual follow-up, with draft talking points for each.
In / outClustered error and misconception patterns → tiered response plan (re-teach / broadcast / individual) with draft talking points per track
You might say…
“I know what they got wrong. Now I need to decide whether to address it live, post a video, or just message the three people it applies to.”
What it does
Takes the clustered patterns and recommends which gaps justify a live re-teach versus an async broadcast versus individual follow-up, with draft talking points for each. Used to decide the group-level response to a batch's patterns.
Trigger: Use after error patterns are clustered, to convert a synthesis note into a concrete response plan that doesn't waste the whole group's time on issues that only affect a few.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation