Score adjacent areas against expansion criteria
Assesses each candidate division or function against problem-fit, budget likelihood, accessibility via existing contacts, and strategic value to produce a reasoned expansion ranking.
In / outStakeholder map + expansion criteria → ranked adjacency shortlist with assessments per candidate
You might say…
“We have five potential areas to pursue — I need to know which one to focus on first and why.”
What it does
Assesses each candidate division, function, or executive against problem-fit, budget likelihood, accessibility via existing contacts, and strategic value to the firm, weighing the criteria in context to produce a reasoned ranking. Used to turn the raw stakeholder map into a comparable shortlist of expansion options.
Trigger: Use to convert a raw stakeholder map into a comparable, prioritised shortlist of expansion targets.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation