Assess evidence sufficiency and prioritise gaps
Applies expert judgement to the coverage gap report to decide whether the evidence is sufficient to proceed to analysis or whether specific gaps must be closed first.
In / outCoverage gap report + decision stakes → sufficiency verdict per analytical question + prioritised gap-closure actions
You might say…
“A coverage diff tells you what's missing; this tells you whether it matters enough to delay the analysis or whether you can qualify the finding.”
What it does
Judges whether the assembled evidence is sufficient to begin analysis, decides which gaps are material vs tolerable, and recommends targeted follow-up or escalation to the engagement lead. Used at the gather/analyse boundary, taking the coverage report as input.
Trigger: Use after the coverage diff tool has run; provide the gap report and the client's analytical decision stakes.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation