Map the players, their agendas, and the real constraint
Given conversation notes and context, maps who is involved, each player's likely real agenda, the internal dynamics shaping whether advice will land, and the stated versus probable real constraint.
In / outConversation notes, known parties → stakeholder map: players, agendas, dynamics, stated constraint vs real constraint
You might say…
“The CEO asked me to fix the sales team. The map showed me the board chair had already decided who was leaving — I was being hired to provide cover.”
What it does
Given conversation notes and any context on who is involved, lays out who is in the room, the decision-maker's likely real agenda, the internal dynamics that will shape whether advice lands, and the stated constraint versus the probable real one. Used after early conversations to make the political and relational landscape explicit before judging fit.
Trigger: Use after early conversations when you need to make the political and relational landscape explicit before deciding whether to proceed.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation