Surface clarifying questions and pushback while reading
Generates probing questions, weak points, and counter-arguments against a source chunk to deepen critical engagement mid-read.
In / outSource chunk → margin-ready questions, identified weak points, and counter-arguments
You might say…
“I read it, I agreed with it, and then three days later I couldn't explain why I agreed.”
What it does
Reads a chunk of the source alongside the practitioner and generates probing questions, weak points, and counter-arguments to mark in the margins. Used mid-read to deepen engagement and capture critical reactions rather than passively underlining.
Trigger: Use mid-read when you want active critical engagement rather than passive absorption — especially with sources you expect to cite or argue against.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation