Propose a staffing allocation across the engagement load
Given the forecast and engagement requirements, reasons out a candidate who-does-what-when allocation, matching analyst fit and availability to each engagement and surfacing trade-offs.
In / outCapacity forecast, analyst availability, engagement requirements → proposed staffing allocation with trade-off notes and conflict flags
You might say…
“I know roughly who needs to go where but I always miss the collision that's hiding two weeks out — I need a reasoned draft I can actually pressure-test.”
What it does
Given the forecast, the capacity model, and engagement requirements, reasons out a candidate who-does-what-when allocation — matching analyst/producer fit and availability to each engagement and phase, surfacing the trade-offs and any unavoidable conflicts. Used when the principal needs a defensible starting allocation to confirm or adjust.
Trigger: Use when the principal needs a defensible starting allocation to confirm or adjust before communicating assignments to the team.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation