Evaluate a candidate's work-sample against the quality rubric
Scores one candidate's submitted work-sample output against the firm's quality standard, dimension by dimension, and forms a go/no-go judgement with evidence.
In / outCandidate work-sample submission + assessment rubric → scored dimension-by-dimension evaluation with go/no-go judgement and evidence
You might say…
“I know roughly whether the work is good but I can never articulate why clearly enough to defend the decision — especially when a candidate pushes back.”
What it does
Scores one candidate's submitted work-sample output against the firm's quality standard, dimension by dimension, and forms a go/no-go judgement with evidence. Used per shortlisted candidate after they complete the trial task.
Trigger: Use per shortlisted candidate after they complete the trial task.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation