Check the argument against the client's actual question
Compares the draft's line of reasoning against the client's real question and brief, judging whether the answer is on-point or has drifted into adjacent-but-irrelevant territory.
In / outDraft output + original client question and brief → Verdict on relevance (on-point or drifted) with specific callouts of where the answer diverges from the question
You might say…
“The logic is sound but I keep having the feeling they've answered the wrong question — I want a direct check against what the client actually asked.”
What it does
Compare the draft's line of reasoning against the client's real question and brief, judging whether the answer is on-point or has drifted into adjacent-but-irrelevant territory. Used after the internal logic checks out, to confirm the right question is being answered.
Trigger: Use after the internal logic holds up, to confirm the draft answers the client's actual question rather than an adjacent one.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation