Capture how peer input shifted your judgement
Packaged know-how that tells an agent how to do a job well.
You might say…
“After peer supervision I always felt I'd learned something, but I could rarely say precisely what had shifted and why.”
What it does
Extracts from post-exchange notes exactly where peer input confirmed, challenged, or revised the position the advisor brought in — naming the specific judgement that moved and what evidence or reasoning moved it.
Trigger: Use immediately after structured peer contact to make the calibration durable — before the conversation fades and the shift dissipates.
I/O: Peer exchange notes + original position → named judgement deltas with what moved them
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation