Capture how peer input shifted your judgement
Extracts from post-exchange notes exactly where peer input confirmed, challenged, or revised the position the advisor brought in — naming the specific judgement that moved and what evidence or reasoning moved it.
In / outPeer exchange notes + original position → named judgement deltas with what moved them
You might say…
“After peer supervision I always felt I'd learned something, but I could rarely say precisely what had shifted and why.”
What it does
Single-judgement skill: after a peer exchange, the advisor points it at their notes from the discussion and it extracts where peer input confirmed, challenged, or revised the position they brought in — naming the specific judgement that moved and what evidence or reasoning moved it. Used immediately after structured peer contact to make the calibration durable rather than letting it dissipate, with the advisor owning which shifts they actually accept.
Trigger: Use immediately after structured peer contact to make the calibration durable — before the conversation fades and the shift dissipates.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation