Surface and rank candidate first-contribution opportunities
From early notes on open problems and pending decisions, generates a shortlist of candidate first contributions ranked by where you have genuine signal versus where it merely sounds impressive.
In / outEarly observations + open problems + pending decisions → ranked shortlist of candidate first contributions
You might say…
“I had opinions on five things. I needed to know which ones I actually had grounds for — and which were just noise dressed as insight.”
What it does
From notes on the first days (open problems, pending decisions, unanswered questions overheard), generate a shortlist of candidate first moves and rank each on where you have genuine signal versus where it merely sounds impressive. Used once early, when deciding what to weigh in on first.
Trigger: Use once early, when deciding what to weigh in on first — to surface options before committing to one.
Recognise the problem?
The primitives are the commodity part. The fastest next step is a conversation about composing them into something that works for you.
Start a conversation